Advertisement
Advertisement

The Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technology ISSN: 1937-8254


The Fullendoscopic Anterior Cervical Fusion: A New Horizone For The Selective Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Decompression


S. Hellinger Dr. med. Munich Germany

Citation:  S. Hellinger: The Fullendoscopic Anterior Cervical Fusion: A New Horizone For The Selective Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Decompression. The Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technology. 2007 Volume 1 Number 2


Abstract


There is a high incidence of cervical discogenic pain symptoms in the population. It is estimated that one person in five in Germany who visits an orthopedic surgeon presents with the symptoms of a cervical disc syndrome. The treatment of cervical discogenic diseases makes high demands in terms of both diagnostics and therapy. Diagnostics has been made easier by improved imaging and the enhancement of neurological measuring methods. Consequently, there is now interdisciplinary consensus that the principal pathologic causes can be reliably identified.

The most common cause of cervical pain syndromes is a degenerative change in the intervertebral disc, where disc tissue is displaced, on the one hand, and damage occurs in the movement segment, on the other hand. Displacement of disc tissue to the epidural space may give rise to a biochemical lesion, vascular compression and mechanical compression of neural structures. This results in pain in the neck and head region, radiating into the arm, and also vegetative symptoms or even neurologic disorders. Other causes of disc-related pain are to be found in the dorsal anulus fibrosus, the posterior spinal ligament and the periosteum of the vertebral bodies, where there are active pain receptors.

With the aid of appropriate conservative therapy, approximately 80 percent of all cervical syndromes can be cured. Only once all the conservative and semi-invasive procedures have been exhausted should surgery be considered.

The development of surgical procedures for the treatment of intervertebral discs began in 1908 with the transdural removal of disc tissue with the aid of laminectomy by Oppenheimer and Krause. Extradural rectification of a herniated disc was prepared by Mixter and Barr in 1934. Later, Mixter and Barr also began looking at cervical intervertebral disc displacements. The intervention was developed on the lumbar spine, progressing from laminectomy to hemilaminectomy, and then to fenestrotomy and finally endoscopy (Hijikata 1975). The first operation on the cervical spine was performed by Elsberg in 1922, also transdurally. As from 1955, ventral methods of operation were introduced by Cloward, Smith and Robinson, and these are still standard procedures in the surgical treatment of discogenic diseases to this day. Both procedures has been combined with the fusion of the segment by a bone graft. This method continues to be accompanied by the problems of access morbidity (the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve lesions alone is put at 11%-15% (Apfelbaum)). The desire to reduce these problems led to continued development of the method. A discussion soon arose as to whether the fusion is necessary, and as early as 1960, Hirsch introduced the anterior cervical discectomy without fusion. In further studies, results comparable to fusion were obtained in many cases. The question regarding limited disc removal was also answered in favor of a selective procedure.

In recent years attempts have been made to preserve the physiologic mobility of the diseased movement segment by the use of intervertebral prostheses (artificial discs). This development will undoubtedly produce interesting results. The other focus of attention was on reducing surgical trauma and access morbidity. The first step was the introduction of the operating microscope by Hankinson and Wilson in 1966. Other innovations, such as high-speed burrs and bipolar electrocoagulation, produced a further reduction in surgical trauma.

With the aim of miniaturizing the treatment, non-endoscopic percutaneous procedures were soon being used on selected patients, and these also produced good results and a complication rate of less than 1 percent (Hellinger 2004). Thus, chemonucleolysis, which was introduced by Smith in 1964, was performed on the cervical spine. Similarly, automated discectomy (Onik 1985), percutaneous laser disc decompression and nucleotomy (Hellinger 1990) and the use of radiofrequency (Coblation 2003) broadened the percutaneous spectrum.

As a bridge between open and percutaneous therapy, endoscopy of the cervical Spine started to be used at the beginning of the 1990s (Lee, Chiu, Fontanella), following good experiences on the lumbar spine. The principle of microsurgery is combined with the minimally invasive principles by bringing the optical level to the forefront of pathology. Access morbidity has been significantly reduced by the percutaneous access technique. Furthermore, a large proportion of the intervertebral disc, in particular most of the anulus fibrosus, is preserved. The pathology is only removed selectively in the area of the nucleus pulposus and on the dorsal fibrous ring. This preserves the remaining biomechanical function of the degenerated intervertebral disc. By means of tried and tested minimally invasive methods under vision, such as the use of a laser to ablate and shrink tissue, the risk of complications has been further reduced, at the same time as enhancing efficiency. The advancement of the endoscopic technique with increased miniaturization of the endoscope and working options led to a restriction of use (e.g. LASE system).

Our objective was to create an adequate working space in front of the endoscope while preserving the minimally invasive approach. This was achieved by the use of dilation sheaths, which force the base plate and upper plate of the vertebras apart in the manner of a Cloward distractort and permit a working field of 5 mm or 6 mm. Here the visualization is sufficient to expose the ventral epidural space. A swiveling maneuver of the endoscope (fan sweep, Chiu) enables the dorsal section of the intervertebral disc to be visualized from one uncovertebral joint to the other as necessary. Removal of disc material is limited to the pathologic part, in a similar way to arthroscopic meniscus surgery. Equally, the surgeon has to become accustomed to the fact that limited viewing fields are lined up, rather as in joint arthroscopy. An irrigation system is used to rinse the ablated disc material out of the viewing field and to achieve partial hemostasis. Endosopic cervical discectomy can also be performed using a gas medium. In this case, it is advisable to use a familiar view, such as through a microscope, to facilitate differentiation of the individual structures.

While our primary aim has been to save the motion segment by an endoscopic procedure as well as possible, we get some times patients with a severe instability of a cervical motion segment, that requires a fusion or prostheses.

After the good experiences we got with our new endoscopic system build by Fa. Karl Storz in the treatment of cervical disc herniations with 85% success rate, comparable to the results of Chiu or Lee, we tried to develop a system and a procedure to do a fusion through a working sleeve. Meanwhile Lee got good results 2005 by using a WSHCervical B-Twin as a sole spacer without fusion in the cervical intervertebral space, we decided to modify the Cloward procedure for the endoscope. The intention has been by using a bone dowel to get an osseous fusion and to induce the resorption of spurs, like Cloward did.

After this we did the fullendoscopic fusion surgery in march 2006. It has been a 50 year old female with neck and head pain on VAS 8. Beside there has been a pain radiation into the left arm. The X-Ray has shown a mild spondylosis and in functional pictures there has been a movement between the vertebral bodies C4 and C5 to a quarter. In the MRI we found a disc extrusion left sided on this level.

The procedure was similar to the Selective Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Decompression. The level of the intervertebral disc that is to be operated on is marked using the C-arm. Then an approx. 5mm skin incision is made at this level on the right side, medially to the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and the platysma is exposed without cutting. Following lateralization of the carotid artery and the jugular vein, and medialization of the larynx, trachea, esophagus and thyroid gland by applying pressure with the index finger and middle finger, the anterior surface of the cervical spine can be touched. Under fluoroscopy, an 18G spinal needle is then inserted into the intervertebral disc, preferably in the midline, via the skin incision. The position of the needle is checked in at least two planes with the C-arm. Then a guidewire and various obturators can be placed on the intervertebral disc via the needle. A 6,5 mm working sleeve is inserted into the anterior fibrous ring via the last obturator. For this purpose, the dilation sleeve system has proved successful. The two narrow lips of the sleeve are tapped into the fibrous ring and, following removal of the fibrous ring inside the sleeve, the sleeve is rotated and the base plate and upper plate are spread apart. The working sleeve can now be advanced further into the disk space. The procedure is facilitated by using a trephine and a shaver. Under endoscopic vision, the intervertebral disc can be curetted in a wide channel as far as the posterior fibrous ring. The pathological region of the posterior fibrous ring, previously identified by imaging, determines the angle of entry into the intervertebral disc. This section of the disc is located and ablated together with the prolapsed disc tissue. When so doing, the working area can, if necessary, be extended as far as the uncovertebral joints by swiveling the endoscope. If required, the excision forceps can be used to carefully open the posterior spinal ligament and expose the epidural space. Similarly, relatively small osteophytes can be ablated under fluoroscopic vision using the ring curet. It is also possible, when working in the dorsal disc space, to change over to the gas medium. This gives a picture familiar from microscopy. A final check of the decompression is carried out with the palpation hook.

After the decompression we designed a bed for the bone graft in the midline with different burrs. The bone graft has removed from the iliac crest with a special gouge to create a compressed spongeous cylinder of 6mm diameter in the checked length. For safety we took more cylinder. Than the graft in combination with osteoinductive proteins (Coloss®) has been placed in the intervertebral bed through the working sleeve under endoscopic and flouroscopic view with various pushers. A last endoscopic view has shown the correct position of the graft. After removal of the scope the wound was closed like a band aid surgery.

After the surgery the pain of the patient diminished to VAS 1. The arm pain disappeared. The postoperative CT scans and X-rays show a correct positioning of the bone dowel with a good distraction. After six weeks a further CT scan has shown a beginning good fusion without any dislocation as well as a remaining good clinical outcome

Conclusion

The result of this method displays that a fullendoscopic fusion of the cervical spine with a bone dowel is possible. The clinical result seems to be comparable to the classical Cloward procedure. But the approach by 6,5 mm avoids a lot of complications, that are seen in open surgery. It entails less surgical trauma, and considerably reduces surgery-related stress for the patient, while also shortening the period of hospitalization.

To the best of my knowledge, this is the first report of a fullendoscopic osseous fusion on the cervical spine. Further investigations are necessary to determine the real outcome of this procedure. The future will show with the further development of new instruments and implants what real minimal invasive spine surgery will enable on cervical spine.


                  
          Figure 1: Flouroscopic control of the preparation of the endplates with a special burr

Figure 1: Flouroscopic control of the preparation of the endplates with a special burr


                  
          Figure 2: Endoscopic view of the intervertebral space after preparation and control with 
a hook

Figure 2: Endoscopic view of the intervertebral space after preparation and control with a hook


                  
          Figure 3: Inserting of bon cylinder in the working sleeve

Figure 3: Inserting of bon cylinder in the working sleeve


                  
          Figure 4: Flouroscopic view of the endoscopic placed bone craft

Figure 4: Flouroscopic view of the endoscopic placed bone craft


                  
          Figure 5: Endoscopic control of the placed bone cylinder

Figure 5: Endoscopic control of the placed bone cylinder


                  
          Figure 6: Postoperative 3D CT scan of the fusion

Figure 6: Postoperative 3D CT scan of the fusion


                  
          Figure 7: Postoperative sagittal CT of the graft

Figure 7: Postoperative sagittal CT of the graft


                  
          Figure 8: The prepared bone graft

Figure 8: The prepared bone graft

References

1. Adson AW: Bandscheibenzerreißung mit Prolaps des Nucleus pulposus in den Wirbelkanal als Ursache rezidivierender Ischias. Chirurg 1940; 12: 501-509.
2. Apfelbaum RI, Kriskovich MD, Haller JR (2000) On the incidence , cause and prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine 25: 2906-2912
3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS: Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20:1055-1060, 1995.
4. Biondi DM. Cervicogenic headache: Mechanisms, evaluation and treatment strategies. J Amer Osteopath Assoc 2000; 100: S7-S14.
5. Bryan V: Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 (Suppl. 2): S92-S97.
6. Bucy PC, Heimburger RF, Oberhill HR: Compression of the cervical spinal cord by herniated intervertebral discs. J Neurosurg 5:471-492, 1948.
7. Bush K Chaudhuri R, Hillier S et al. The pathomorphologic changes that accompany the resolution of cervical radiculopathy. A prospective study with repeat magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 1997; 22:183-186.
8. Chiu J, Clifford T, Greenspan M. Percutaneous microdecompressive endoscopic cervical discectomy with laser thermodiskoplasty. Mt Sinai J. of Med 2000;67:278-282.
9. Chiu, J., Clifford, T. Cervical endoscopic discectomy with laser thermodiskoplasty. In: Savitz MH, Chiu JC, Yeung AT, eds. The Practice of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technique, AAMISMS Education, Richmond; 2000:141-148
10. Chiu J.C. et al. (2001) Multicenter study of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (lumbar, cervical, and thoracic) J Minim Invasive Spinal Tech: Vol.1, 33-37
11. Cloward R. Lesions of the intervertebral disc and their treatment by interbody fusion methods. Clin Orthop 1963; 27: 51
12. Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical discs. J Neurosurg 15:602- 614, 1958
13. Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Kostuik JP: Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 9:202-206, 1996.
14. Cummins BH, Robertson JT, Gill S: Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint. J Neurosurg 1998; 88: 943-948.
15. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE et al.: Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 2003; 28: 110-117.
16. DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, et al: Anterior interbody fusion for severe disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet 134:755-758, 1972
17. Dunsker SB: Anterior cervical discectiomy with and without fusion. Clin Neurosurg 24:516-521, 1977
18. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH: Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacentlevel intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 2002; 27: 2431-2434.
19. Eysel P, Fürderer S, Rompe JD, Zöllner J: Die Primärstabilität unterschiedlicher Cages zur Fusion an der Halswirbelsäule. Zentralbl Neurochir 2000; 61: 171-180.
20. Flynn T. Neurologic complications of anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine 1982; 7: 536
21. Fontanella A. Endoscopy microsurgery in herniated cervical discs, 1997, Neurological research; VOL:21 (1); p.31-8
22. Fontanella A. Minimally invasive neurosurgery. A convincing alternative to open surgery. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 1997; 10: 541
23. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, Van Loon et al.: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prothesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003; 28: 2673-2678.
24. Gore DR, Gardner DM, Sepic SB, et al: Roentgenographic findings following anterior cervical fusion. Skelet Radiol 15: 556-559, 1986
25. Grote W, Bettag W, Wüllenweber R: Indikation, Technik, Ergebnisse zervikaler Fusionen. Acta Neurochir 1970; 22: 1-27.
26. Harada J, Dohi M, Fukada K et al. CT-guided percutaneous disc decompression (PLDD) for cervical disc hernia. Radiat Med 2001; 19:263-266.
27. Haufe SM, Mork AR, Complications associated with cervical endoscopic discectomy with the holmiam laser, J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2004 Feb; 22: 57-58
28. Heckman JG, Lang CJ, Zobelein I et al. Herniated cervical discs with radiculopathy: an outcome study of conservatively or surgically treated patients. J Spinal Disord 1999; 12:396-401.
29. Hellinger J, Complications of non-endoscopic percutaneous laser disc decompression and nucleotomy with the neodymium: YAG laser 1064 nm, Photomedicine and laser surgery; VOL: 22 (5); p. 418-22
30. Hellinger J, Technical aspects of the percutaneous cervical and lumbar laser-disc-decompression and -nucleotomy, Neurological research; VOL:21 (1); p.99-102
31. Hijikata S.: Percutaneous nucleotomy: A new concept of technique and 12 years experience, Clin Orthop 1989;238:9-23.
32. Hilibrand AS, Yoo JU, Carlson GD, et al: The success of anterior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion. Spine 22:1574-1579, 1997
33. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al.: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A:519-528, 1999.
34. Hoogland T, Scheckenbach C. Low-dose chemonucleolysis combined with percutaneous nucleotomy in herniated cervical discs. J Spinal Disord 1995; 8:228-232
35. Jöllenbeck B, Hahne R, Schubert A, Firsching R: Early experiences with cervical disc protheses. Zentralbl Neurochir 2004; 65: 123-127.
36. Kast E, Antoniadis G, Richter H-P: Die Epidemiologie von Bandscheibenoperationen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Zentralbl Neurochi 2000; 61: 22-25.
37. Knight MT, Goswami A, Patko JT. Cervical percutaneous laser disc decompression: preliminary results of an ongoing prospective outcome study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19:1-2.
38. Lee SH: Percutaneous cervical discectomy with forceps and endoscopic Ho:YAG laser. In: Lasers in the Musculoskeletal System (Gerber BE, Knight M, Siebert WE, eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2001, pp. 292-302.
39. Lee SH, Percutaneous cervical stabilization using the WSHCervical B-Twin, Joint Dls ReI Surg 2005: 76(2):82-87
40. Lee S. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic discectomy to open anterior discectomy for cervical herniations. J Minim Invasive Spinal Tech Vol 1, Inaugural 2001
41. Martins AN: Anterior cervical discectomy with and without interbody bone graft. J Neurosurg 44:290-295, 1976
42. Mixter WS, Barr JS: Rupture of intervertebral disc with involvement of spinal canal. N Engl J M 1934; 211: 210-215.
43. Müller H, Staimer G, Grumme T (1998) Zervikaler Bandscheibenprolaps - Ergebnisse der ventralen zervikalen Diskektomie ohne Interponat. In: Matzen KA: Therapie des Bandscheibenvorfalls, Zuckschwerdt München, S. 60-65
44. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW: The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2004; 2: 155-159.
45. Nurick S: The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95: 101-108.
46. Peterson DI, Austin GM, Dayes LA. Headache associated with discogenic disease of the cervical spine. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 1975; 40:96-100.
47. Pfeifer BA, Freidberg SR, Jewell ER: Repair of injured vertebral artery in anterior cervical proceduresSpine 19: 1471-1474, 1994
48. Pointillart V: Cervical disc prothesis in humans, first failure. Spine 2002; 26: E90-E92.
49. Rezaian SM, Universal endoscopic discectomy, Poster 297, AAOS 2005 Annual Meeting
50. Reuter M. Laser assisted spinal endoscopy for herniated cervical discs. J Minim Invasive Spinal Tech Vol 2, Spring 2002
51. Robinson RA, Smith GW: Anterolateral cervical disc removal and interbody fusion for cervical disc syndrome. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1955; 96:223-224.
52. Saringer. W. F., Endoscopic anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: anatomical morphometric analysis and preliminary clinical experience. J. Neurosurg: Spine / Volume 98 / March, 2003
53. Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J: A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: Surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery 43:268-274, 1998
54. Schofferman J, Garges K, Goldwaithe N et al. Upper cervical anterior discectomy and fusion improves discogenic cervical headaches. Spine 2002; 27:2240-2244.
55. Shea M; Takeuchi TY; Wittenberg RH; White AA 3rd; Hayes WC. A comparison of the effects of automated percutaneous diskectomy and conventional diskectomy on intradiscal pressure, disc geometry, and stiffness. Journal of Spinal Disorders 1994; 7:317-25.
56. Smith G, Robinson R: The treatment of certaim cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 49: 607-622.
57. Snyder GM, Bernhardt AM: Anterior cervical fractional interspace decompression for treatment of cervical radiculopathy. A review of the first 66 cases. Clin Orthop 246:92-99, 1989
58. Spurling R, Scoville W. Lateral rupture of the cervical intervertebral discs. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944; 78: 350
59. Tew JM, Mayfield FH. Complications of surgery of the anterior cervical spine. Clin Neurosurg 1975; 23: 424
60. Tomaras CR, Blacklock JB, Parker WD, Harper RL: Outpatient surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Neurosurgery 87:41-43, 1997
61. Vijay Singh, Percutaneous Disc Decompression for the Treatment of Chronic Atypical Cervical Discogenic Pain, Pain Physician. 2004;7:115-118,
62. Watters WC III, Levinthal R: Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. Results, complications and long term follow up. Spine 19:2343-2347, 1994
63. Wilson DH, Campbe I DD. Anterior cervical discectomy without bone graft. Report of 71 cases. J Neurosurg 1977; 47: 551
64. Zdeblick T, Wilson D, Cooke M, etal. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A comparison of techniques in an animal model. Spine 1992; 17: S418

Generated at: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:58:04 -0500 (00000233) — http://www.ispub.com:80/journal/the-internet-journal-of-minimally-invasive-spinal-technology/volume-1-number-2/the-fullendoscopic-anterior-cervical-fusion-a-new-horizone-for-the-selective-percutaneous-endoscopic-cervical-decompression.html