|
|
|
|
The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology™ ISSN: 1092-406X| Home | Editors | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions for Authors | Disclaimer |Comparison Of Autologous Vs Homologous Blood Transfusion Combined With Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution And Hypotensive Anaesthesia In Spine SurgeriesRelated Articles
Shilpa Rao
Rajendra D. Patel
Citation: S. Rao & R. D. Patel : Comparison Of Autologous Vs Homologous Blood Transfusion Combined With Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution And Hypotensive Anaesthesia In Spine Surgeries . The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2008 Volume 18 Number 1 Keywords: acute normovolemic hemodilution | hypotensive anaesthesia | blood transfusion AbstractBackground : Major spine surgeries are almost always associated with significant blood loss and associated hemodynamic instability. It is the responsibility of the anaesthesiologist to ensure that stable hemodynamics are maintained throughout the surgery, at the same time minimizing the risks associated with blood transfusion, using blood conservation strategies during the surgery.
IntroductionMajor spine surgeries are associated with clinically significant blood losses and hemodynamic instability. This would necessitate multiple homologous blood and plasma transfusions of large volume, which are associated with significant risks to the patient, such as transmission of infections , acute lung injury, autoimmune reactions, sensitization reactions and hemolysis. Blood collected from a patient for re transfusion at a later time into that same individual is “autologous blood transfusion”. It is a safer method, eliminating the risks of infections and alloimmunization. There is decreased demand on the blood bank and cancellations of elective surgeries due to non availability of blood are avoided. Acute normovolemic hemodilution refers to the removal of blood from the surgical patient immediately before or just after induction of anaesthesia, replacement with asanguinuous fluid and later re infusion of the withdrawn blood into the same patient. Thus reducing the hematocrit. This is simpler and reduces the need for transfusion, without compromising the oxygen delivery to the patient. However, there are certain limitations which curtail its use in all patients. Hypotensive anaesthesia is a method in which the systolic blood pressure of the patient is iatrogenically, thereby reducing the amount of intra operative blood loss. This also reduces transfusion requirements in the patient. Aims And Objectives
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
A valid, written and informed consent was taken after explaining to the patient, the risks and benefits of autologous blood transfusion, giving them the opportunity to consent to, or refuse the procedure. This was done in the language and manner best suited for patient comprehension. Institution ethics committee approval was obtained prior to the conduct of the study. Material And MethodsThe criteria for choosing autologous donors are not as stringent as those of allogeneic donors. 50 patients were chosen and divided into 2 groups : Group A - In whom hemodilution and hypotensive anaesthesia were employed, but without collecting blood from the patient for the purpose of transfusion. Group B - In whom acute normovolemic hemodilution with hypotensive anaesthesia were employed , after collecting autologous blood prior to induction of anaesthesia. Procedure And Conduct Of The StudyIn the Autologous Group : After taking consent for autologous blood transfusion , the patient is taken into the operation theatre and intravenous line is secured with a 16G veinflow and intravenous crystalloid solution namely Ringer's Lactate was started. The procedure of collecting blood from the patient is explained to the patient and whole blood is collected via a venous access, using commercially available sterile autologous blood collection kits, using the antecubital vein. The Citrate – phosphate – dextrose – Adenine anticoagulant bag (CPD – A) is used, along with a weighing scale, where 1 gram is 1 cc of whole blood approximately. Estimation of the amount of blood to be collected depended on various factors including those , which are responsible for increasing intraoperative blood loss. The various factors include :
Each standard whole blood unit was equal to 350 cc. Blood was collected by gravity dependent drainage. The bag was kept on the weighing machine for estimation of the amount of blood collected and a tourniquet was tied on the arm, inflating it to approximately 20-30 mm Hg above systolic blood pressure of the patient. The unit of blood was sealed, and labeled with patient identification and stored at room temperature in the operating room. In 9 patients, the duration of surgery was more than 8 hours, and so was the time elapsed prior to the reinfusion. In these cases, blood was refrigerated for 2-3 hours prior to reinfusion. The maximum quantity of blood to be sequestered was calculated to produce a reduction in haemoglobin to a level of 9 gm/dl or higher, after haemodilution. For this , the following equation was used – The amount of blood to be withdrawn = estimated blood volume * (pre operative Hb-desired Hb) / pre operative Hb Volume of blood collected was replaced simultaneously with Ringer Lactate solution, at the rate of 3:1 for the first pint of blood withdrawn, and subsequent hemodilution if greater than one pint of blood was withdrawn, was done based on the vital parameters, haemoglobin and haematocrit level such that Hb does not fall below 9 gm/dl and haematocrit does not fall below 25 %. The entire procedure was completed in the immediate preoperative period , before induction of anaesthesia , and typically required approximately 30-45 minutes. In the control groupThese patients were also hemodiluted at the rate of 30ml/kg to achieve adequate hemodilution and hypotensive anaesthesia along with infiltration was employed. Anaesthesia managementAll patients were premedicated with Tab Atenolol 0.3-0.5 mg/kg body weight in the morning of surgery with sips of water. Inj. Atropine 0.01 mg/kg intramuscularly was given half an hour prior to surgery as an antisialogogue. All patients were induced with Inj. Thiopentone sodium 5-7 mg/kg and succinylcholine 2 mg/kg , and intubated with an adequate sized cuffed armour endotracheal tube and maintained on an open circuit with a non re breathing valve , with controlled ventilation with oxygen:nitrous oxide mixture on a 40:60 ratio with 0.5% halothane continuous throughout the surgery. All patients were sedated intraoperatively with Inj. Buprenorphine 3 microgm/kg body weight, and Inj. Midazolam 0.03 – 0.06 mg/kg body weight. All patients were maintained on an intravenous infusion pump of Inj. Vecuronium, a long acting non – depolarizing agent with 4 mg in 50 ml of 5 % dextrose at 40 ml/hour. All patients were positioned in the prone position for the surgery. All patients were infiltrated with epinephrine (1 in 500000) in sensorcaine (20 ml in 500 ml of normal saline) , using 30 – 50 ml of solution on an average. For hypotensive anaesthesia, a nitroglycerin infusion using 5 mg in 50 cc of 5% dextrose was used. The nitroglycerin was combined with vecuronium in the same infusion drip, and giving at the same rate. Systolic blood pressure was maintained in such a way that it does not fall below 80mmHg .The desired level of hypotension was obtained before incision and maintained upto the completion of surgery. Halothane 0.5 % was administered continuously during the surgery in order to maintain the adequate depth of anaesthesia and the desired level of hypotension. Tab. Atenolol , a potent hypotensive drug used as a premedication also served to maintain the level of hypotension. Intraoperative monitoring was achieved by :
Blood loss was estimated by
Time of transfusionIn the autologous group , all patients were administered blood after haemostasis was achieved and closure started , before reversal of the patient , irrespective of the requirement. In the control group , homologous blood was only transfused when the blood loss far exceeded the tolerable blood loss so much so that the Hb levels fell to 9 gm/dl and below , and the haematocrit fell to 26.8 % and below , the oxygen saturation was not being maintained and the patient had acidosis. All patients were reversed with Inj. Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and Inj. Atropine 0.02 mg/kg and extubated after confirming adequate tone, power and reflexes as per the case's pre operative condition.No patient required ventilator support after surgery. Arterial lines were discontinued post operatively. Post transfusion , all the vital parameters including pulse, BP, ECG, oxygen saturation, Hb, Haematocrit were monitored and recorded in all the patients. Post operative monitoring continued as an extension of post transfusion monitoring and as per the Hb and Haematocrit values, post operative blood transfusion – homologous blood , or haematinics were advised. Observations , Graphs And ResultsThe present study was carried out to preclude the use of homologous blood in spinal surgeries, by employing various techniques. Fifty patients were studied, which included a random study of patients above 13 years of age, with an average weight of 50 kg. They compromised of two groups : Group A – patients in whom haemodilution with hypotensive anaesthesia was done without autologous blood withdrawal prior to induction of anaesthesia. Group B – patients in whom acute normovolemic hemodilution combined with hypotensive anaesthesia was employed i.e. in these patients, autologous blood was removed prior to induction of anaesthesia. Fourteen patients belonging to Group B were transfused autologous blood irrespective of the indication to do so. In case of Group A, patients were transfused blood as per hemodynamic status and tolerable blood loss. Thirteen patients out of 25 patients had to be transfused more than 1 pint of blood. In the randomized study , almost equal number of males and females participated in the study. There was no significant difference in the age and the weight of the patients in both the groups who participated in the study.
Intraoperatively, Hb was maintained at 9.18 +/- 0.69 gm% and the PCV was maintained at 27.28 +/- 2.301%. The post transfusion values of Hb and PCV were much lower than the pre operative values.
The intraoperative values of Hb were maintained at 10 +/- 1.35 gm% and a PCV of 28.08 +/- 3.87 gm%. The post transfusion values of Hb and PCV were not much lower than the pre operative values , signifying a lesser amount of blood loss which could be easily corrected.
( 1 unit = 350 ml ) The amount of homologous blood replaced was significantly higher ( p < 0.005 ) as compared to the autologous blood transfusion as per the unpaired t – test.
The maximum duration of surgery was 12 hours and the minimum duration of surgery was 2 hours.
The intra operative ABG in both control as well as autologous groups were maintained within the normal limits without any significant difference in their values. In our observations, mean and standard deviation and the unpaired t – test were applied as required. In the control group :
In the Autologous group :
Comparative to the control group, the amount of autologous blood transfused was significantly lesser ( p < 0.005 ) , proving that intraoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution reduced the amount of homologous blood required for spinal surgeries. DiscussionBlood collected from a patient for re transfusion at a later time into the same individual is “autologous blood”. Autologous blood can be obtained by pre deposit phlebotomy, intraoperative blood salvage , post operative blood salvage and peri operative normovolemic hemodilution. Predeposit autologous blood donations are scheduled weekly or at 4 day intervals with the phlebotomy performed 72 hours or more before the surgery. Most programmes require the Hemoglobin to be atleast 11 gm % or a PCV of > 34 % before each phlebotomy and oral iron supplements are administered. Diseases and conditions that otherwise preclude blood donations do not preclude autologous blood donation, eg. Cardiovascular disease. If a patient's condition is stable enough to allow elective surgery, he generally can donate several units of blood in a carefully controlled environment. Pregnant women can donate safely, especially in the second trimester. The donated blood should undergo ABO and Rh groups screening, antibody testing, and screening for Hepatitis surface antigen and HTLV type III antigen. Crossmatching is not required and is not economical. (1,2). Advantages of this method are that it is safe in terms of reducing transfusion associated infectious and immunologic risks, relatively a simpler method, reduces the demand for homologous transfusion and may ensure blood availability for patients with rare phenotypes undergoing surgeries. (3,4). Disadvantages of this technique are that there is no preservation of functional platelets, clotting factors and this would lead to the oxygen dissociation curve to the left , the procedure is less cost effective, time consuming and associated with side effects like anemia and hypovolemia to the patient, transient vasovagal reactions and ischemic episodes. There is a potential for administration of contaminated blood. This procedure can be used for elective surgeries only , and its use is limited in emergency surgeries. The greatest potential hazard associated with this procedure is transfusion of pre donated blood to an unintended recipient. (5). Intra operative blood salvage consists of collecting blood in sterile single use reservoir units for immediate re infusion. The oxygen transport properties and survival of salvaged RBC's are equal to or superior to those of stored allogeneic RBC's. However, there are chances of air embolism while reinfusion, pulmonary dysfunction secondary to infusion of cellular debris, coagulopathy, sepsis and activation of coagulation factors which can induce disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. (5) Post operative blood salvage consists of salvaging and re infusion of shed blood following open heart surgery from the mediastinum, and blood from the chest following traumatic hemothorax. Transfusion requirements can be reduces in many patients undergoing these types of surgeries, and recently this technique is also used in orthopedic surgeries. It is considered to be safe and well tolerated, but the contraindications are infected blood and exposure of blood to malignant cells (5) Acute normovolemic hemodilution refers to the removal of blood from the surgical patient immediately before or just after induction of anaesthesia, replacement with asanguinuous fluid and reinfusion of the withdrawn blood at a later time. This is employed to reduce the need for allogeneic RBC's and to avoid the potential complication of transfusion. The chances of clinical error are limited in this technique. There is no influence over the oxygen – Hb dissociation curve and there is improvement in tissue perfusion as a result of decreased viscosity. It is simpler and less expensive than the earlier methods and it may be acceptable to patients of Jehovah's witness if the blood is maintained in a close circuit continuous system. The major contraindications include anaemia , decreased renal function , patients with significant coronary artery disease and severe carotid artery disease and inadequate vascular access and monitoring facilities. (6,7) The effects of intraoperative blood salvage and induced hypotension on transfusion requirements were studied during 170 spinal surgery patients. It was found that intraoperative autologous transfusion reduced the amount of homologous blood required, by more than 50 % . (8) In our study involving 50 patients using preoperative autologous blood donation and acute normovolemic hemodilution , combined with hypotensive anaesthesia, only one patient out of 50 (2 %) needed to be transfused homologous blood postoperatively. In a study involving acute normovolemic hemodilution and hypotensive anaesthesia in spinal fusion surgery , 17 % of the estimated blood volume was collected in the predonation group (9) In our study , the maximum amount of blood withdrawn was 700 ml and the minimum amount of blood withdrawn was 200 ml, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average intraoperative blood loss in our study was found to be 826 ml in the control group , and 744 ml in the autologous group. Masayoshi et al in their study of the use of autologous blood in the surgical treatment of spinal disorders, observed an average blood loss of 1000-1500 ml in scoliosis patients. (10). We included spine surgeries like scoliosis, PLIF and Koch's decompression surgeries in our study. These are associated with significant blood losses intraoperatively. We maintained an intraoperative BP of mean 93mmHg systolic and diastolic of mean 65mmHg in the control group, and a systolic BP of 99mmHg and diastolic BP of 67mmHg were maintained in the autologous group. No ECG changes were observed suggestive of myocardial ischemia in both the groups. This observation is further supported by the study by Su-Ryong et al , whose study showed the mean BP of 55mmHg and there were no gross changes in the ECG suggestive of myocardial ischemia during the surgery or in the recovery period. (11) . We transfused an average of 676 ml of blood in the control group and 396 ml of blood in the autologous group, which proved to be significant ( p < 0.005 ) as per the unpaired t – test. This proves that Acute normovolemic hemodilution combined with hypotensive anaesthesia significantly reduced the amount of blood loss , and the subsequent transfusion requirements in patients undergoing spinal surgeries. No complications during the entire procedure of Acute normovolemic hemodilution and hypotensive anaesthesia were observed. In conclusion , it can be implied from the above study that –
References1. Consensus Conference . Autologous Blood transfusions . JAMA Nov. 1986 ;256 : 2378 - 2380. (s) 2. National Heart , Lung and Blood Institute Expert panel on the use of autologous blood , Conference report : Peri operative use of Autologous Blood transfusion. 1995 ; 35:703-711. (s) 3. J.K Lohen , M. E. Brecher : Pre operative autologous blood donation : benefit or detriment ? A mathematical analysis . Transfusion 1995 ; 35 : 640-644. (s) 4. J. P. AuBuchion, J. D.Birkmeyer : Is autologous blood transfusion worth the cost ?. Transfusion 1995;35:79-83. (s) 5. M.A.Popovsky , B.Whitaker , N.L.Arnold : Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood donation : frequency and characterization. Transfusion 1995;35:734-737. (s) 6. T. E. Bailey Jr. , O.M. Mahoney : The use of banked autologous blood in patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg - March 1987 ; American volume 69(3) : 329-332. (s) 7. M.K. Viele , R.B. Weiskopf : What can we learn about the need for transfusion from patients who refuse blood ? The experience with Jehovah's Witnesses. Transfusion 1994;34 : 396-401. (s) 8. J.D. Birkmeyer, L.T. Goodnough, J.P. AuBuchon, P.G. Noordsn, B. Littenberg : The cost effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation for total hip and knee replacement. Transfusion 1993 ; 33:544-551. (s) 9. T.E. Bailey, O.M.Mahoney : The use of banked autologous blood in patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg ; 69 - A : 329-331. (s) 10. Masayoshi Oga, Hikalu Ikuta , Yoichi Sugioka : The use of Autologous blood in the surgical treatment of spinal disorders . Spine 1992 ; 17 : 1381-1385. (s) 11. Su- Ryong, A. Bernard , M. Major : Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution combined with Hypotensive Anesthesia and other techniques to avoid Homologous Transfusion in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Spine 1992 ; 17 (8) : 867-873. (s) This article was last modified on Fri, 13 Feb 09 13:16:22 -0600 This page was generated on Mon, 22 Mar 10 03:48:32 -0500, and may be cached. |
|
Home |
Journals |
Sponsors |
Books |
PubMed |
Editorial Help |
Privacy Policy |
Disclaimer |
Job Opportunities |
Contact
Copyright Internet Scientific Publications, LLC., 1996 to 2010. |
|