|
|
|
|
The Internet Journal of Family Practice™ ISSN: 1528-8358| Home | Editors | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions for Authors | Disclaimer |A Snapshot Survey of Rural Doctors' Health and Analysis of a General Practitioner Well Being ProgramRelated Articles
Abrar Rana Waliuddin BMed
Shuba Jeya-Dev
Citation: A. R. Waliuddin & S. Jeya-Dev : A Snapshot Survey of Rural Doctors' Health and Analysis of a General Practitioner Well Being Program . The Internet Journal of Family Practice. 2009 Volume 7 Number 1 Keywords: general practitioner | doctors' health | physician well being | doctors' mental health AbstractAims: To ascertain physical and mental health issues amongst General Practitioners and evaluate an existing wellbeing program in Australia.
Doctors' health is an issue that seems to attract increasing attention these days within our profession. This is evident by the Annual Doctors' Health Conference in Australia entirely dedicated to discussion of this very issue. Are doctors physically healthier than the average person? What role does mental and emotional stress play in doctors' wellbeing? What does the profession do for it's own members in this area? The literature reviews on Doctors' Health shows us a lot of the problems that face this group, but there is little to nothing on rural GPs as a special group. Below is an analysis of the factors we need to consider: Physical Health
Emotional health
Self-CareAnecdotal and some study evidence has long suggested that:
The Health and Equity placement offered by the University of Newcastle was in Ballarat, Victoria, Australia primarily based at the Ballarat & District Division of General Practice (BDDGP). The division had a General Practitioner (GP) wellbeing program set up and a snapshot survey offered a brilliant opportunity to study the different factors in GP health and whether or not the wellbeing program was working. The project was undertaken in September-October 2005 and as such all data comparisons are correct for that period. What population are we talking about?The Ballarat & District Division covers an area of approximately 8100 square kilometers with an estimated population of 122,222 people, according to the 2001 census. The divisional boundaries cover the city of Ballarat and the shires of Pyrenees, Hepburn, Moorabul and Golden Plains. Population centres covered by the Division include Ballarat, Ballan, Creswick, Skipton, Clunes, Trentham and Daylesford. All these centres are served by a total of 102 general practitioners (including 8 GP registrars). Following is a breakdown of the workforce in Ballarat & District Division:
(From: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/medicare+statistics-1) From the figures above we can see that female GPs are a minority, with most of them working part time only. The GP to Population ratio is higher than what is acceptable. There is a large number (38) of GPs over 50 years age who may reduce workload with view to retirement. A number of practices reported a limited capacity to see new patients, which is not surprising considering only 59 out of 102 GPs work fulltime. MethodsThree main areas (work, physical and emotional) were chosen as a focus with only a limited number of issues in each section which were identified during the first 2 weeks on placement. Selection of these issues was made in consultation with GP division advisors and existing literature. The survey was modeled on a questionnaire used to evaluate GP well being in rural South Australia by Dr. Roger Sexton). Results and AnalysisOut of 70 GPs surveyed, it was filled out by 40 GPs (25 male, 15 female), giving a response rate of around 57%. Below are the results of the survey: Work
Physical
Emotional
The survey highlights certain trends, showing the number of GPs who:
However there are several positive trends that were found from this survey, mainly the fact that GPs in general exercise regularly, consume appropriate levels of alcohol and are non-smokers. We need to remember however, that it is possible most of the responses to the survey may have come from GPs who already take good care of their health. A big number of GPs also feel they have a high level of social support and a significant number are happy with the times and hours they work despite being very busy. By now it's abundantly clear that most of health concerns amongst rural GPs lie in the emotional health category with the physical health seemingly not really a major concern. Although the numbers don't quite match up, similar trends were also seen in a comprehensive survey study of rural GPs in South Australia, where the Dr. Doc program was evaluated 11 . In that study, it was shown that:
There is not much evidence at to the reasons for the above findings. The statements used in the emotional health section of our survey were taken from previous research which shows they can be an indicator of worsening mental health. We can look at the stressors in two different ways – stress due to personality traits and stress due to the health care profession or direct patient care. It has been speculated that the selection criteria for entry to medicine may be to blame. Many of the current GPs entered their medical course in an era where selection was overwhelmingly in favour of academic success very early in life. Factors such as being a high achiever, workaholic tendencies, a fear of death and need to control illness have been brought up. Medical training itself is a very stressful process and interpersonal support during training can go a long way to aiding good mental health. Some other stressors which have come to attention because of our survey are the stress of being on-call, being on low remuneration, marital difficulties, bureaucratic changes and time pressures of seeing patients. Among these the most frequently cited stressor, by GPs in Ballarat and rural areas, was time pressure of seeing patients. What is being done to solve the problem?The activities of the GP Well Being program in Ballarat were already in place for 18 months before this survey was commenced. All GPs have been provided with a GP Well Being kit which points them to all the different services. Below are the main features of the program:
Are these initiatives working?As part of our survey, we also tried to find out how well the GP Well Being program was received by the GPs and what parts of the program were making a positive difference in their health. It was found that majority of the respondents were aware of the Well Being program and had found the regular division newsletters and ‘kit' helpful. It did show that some GPs had not received the kit or were unaware of the program probably due to not exploring the contents of the kit very much. As a result of this, the division is now planning on a re-issue of Well Being kits and possibly advertising the service further. Around 24 GPs had their own GP, majority of them having a GP well before they were even introduced to the Doctors for Doctors service. It did show that majority of the GPs did not find their GP using the list on the division website. We found that a significant proportion (37.5%) were more aware of the importance of taking care of one's own health as a GP. And 7 GPs were encouraged to consult their GP more often as a result of exposure to this service, which is a great result. Responses about the Female GP network showed, it helps to increase the business/social contact between female GPs and for 1 out of every 3 female GPs, it helps them cope with work or family pressures. There was found to be a clear need for more meetings of this network each year and the division is responding to this by increasing the number of meetings to 4 next year. A majority of GPs (65%) do feel a Personal and Critical Incident counseling service is important in relieving pressure and maintaining good mental health. Some GPs didn't know about the service, which is again something to do with promoting the service on an ongoing basis. 14 GPs felt that more such visits need to be subsidized. We were been informed however that in the past 18 months, the uptake of this service has been very low with only 2 tokens returned so far (this means that a maximum of 2 GPs may have used it). It was reported there was a need for contacts of more out of town psychologists, as in some cases GPs were reluctant to visit someone in the same town that they refer patients to. Majority of the GPs found their privacy was ensured using the token system, which de-identifies them when paying for the service. Majority of the respondents (72.5%) had not taken advantage of the Corporate Discounts Card and didn't feel that it made a positive difference to their well being. There were some cases where they simply were not in the habit of carrying the card and using it. It may also be that discounts may not make much of a difference to GPs who may already have significant earning power. Feedback about the GP Family CPD conference was very positive with the majority of GPs (60%) feeling the conference was well organized and was a good opportunity to spend time with the family. It was found that most GPs had not accessed any literature on GP Well Being that was available to them on the website. This is not surprising and more needs to be done to bring it to the attention of all GPs, possibly by including the articles regularly in newsletters. What else can be done to improve GP Well Being?The efforts of the BDDGP in implementing a GP Well Being program are commendable, but as with anything in life, we need to continue moving forward and look to the future. Something like additional promotion of the program is one such thing I just mentioned earlier. We came across some other initiatives which are in use in other parts of rural Australia. The worth and effectiveness of these ideas will need to be investigated in the future:
ConclusionAs a result of our placement, exposure was gained to the working conditions of rural GPs and the specific difficulties they face in day to day life. They are governed by a unique set of pressures that city GPs do not face. This can have a significant impact on mental health. How can a GP whose well being has been compromised, serve his/her patients? Although our report paints a negative picture of rural practice and GP health, there are many positives to be taken. For example, we interviewed GPs at one practice who were polar opposites to the trends observed in our study. In the end though, one has to focus on a set of learning experiences, those little incidents or encounters, which leave a long lasting impression. One is struck by the resilience and positive outlook displayed by most GPs in the face of adversity. The work by the local division of general practice is crucial in fostering this spirit. We end this report with the following quote. It cannot be too often or too forcibly brought home to us that the hope of the profession is with the men who do it's daily work in general practice – Sir William Osler AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge the support provided to us by the Ballarat and Districts Division of General Practice. Corresponding AuthorAbrar Rana Waliuddin References1. Definitions: http://www.iseqh.org/ (s) 2. Dr. Margaret Kay, University of Queensland. Letter to the editor. Australian Doctor, Nov 9th 2005. (s) 3. Medicare Statistics: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/medicare+statistics-1 (s) 4. Clode, D (2004). The Conspiracy of Silence among Medical Practitioners: A review of the literature, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. (s) 5. Asp, S., S. Herberg, et al. (1979). Mortality among Finnish doctors 1953-1972. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 7: 55-62. (s) 6. Doll R., Peto R. (1977). Mortality among doctors in different occupations. British Medical Journal i:1433-6. (s) 7. Schlicht, S. M., I. R. Gordon, et al. (1990). Suicide and related deaths in Victorian doctors. Medical Journal of Australia 153: 518-521. (s) 8. Richards, J. G. (1999). The health and health practices of doctors and their families. New Zealand Medical Journal 112: 96-9. (s) 9. Nyman, K. (1991). The health of general practitioners: a pilot survey. Australian Family Physician 20(5): 637-45. (s) 10. McCall, L., T. Maher, et al. (1999). Preventative health behaviour among general practitioners in Victoria. Australian Family Physician 28(8): 854-7. (s) 11. Sexton, R (2002). Rural GP Health: Results are In, ARRWAG Conference Paper. (s) This article was last modified on Fri, 13 Feb 09 13:29:01 -0600 This page was generated on Fri, 20 Nov 09 23:11:37 -0600, and may be cached. |
|
Home |
Journals |
Sponsors |
Books |
PubMed |
Editorial Help |
Privacy Policy |
Disclaimer |
Job Opportunities |
Contact
Copyright Internet Scientific Publications, LLC., 1996 to 2009. |
|